Dear New APELC Student,
Welcome to Junior Year and the wonderful world of AP courses! You’ve
probably walked into Mr. Yost’s room today feeling a bit intimidated by the
mountain of a year that lies before you; especially since you’ve opted to take the
widely-feared Eleventh Grade AP English. Well, you have the right to be a bit
nervous, as Junior Year is the cornerstone of your high school career. However,
I’m going to tell you today that if you’ve come into the year (and specifically this
classroom) focused and ready to improve yourself, you will be absolutely fine.
Since you’ve decided to take AP English this year, it probably means that
you’re the type of student who received high A’s and A+’s each marking period of 9th
and 10th
grade English. One thing to be prepared for as you begin this course is that
you will likely not receive the grades that you’re used to receiving in an English
class. The nature of this course being an AP requires a definite shift in the mindset of
a student transitioning from Honors English classes. But this is no reason to be
discouraged. When you inevitably start out the year receiving grades that are lower
than you’re used to, use this as motivation to improve yourself rather than a cause
for giving up on the class. If you stay motivated and continue giving assignments like
timed essays and short quizzes your full attention, they will undoubtedly get easier
as the year goes on.
Another major thing that people feared last year coming into AP English was
the thought of taking the exam in May. If you’re anything like I was at the beginning
of Junior Year, a three hour long exam that includes hand-writing three full length
essays seems impossible. Rest assured though, by the end of the year you will be so
prepared for the exam that it won’t even seem like anything out of the ordinary. The
daily trials of this class will improve your writing and analysis skills, prepare you for
any arduous future testing occasion, and maybe even end up getting you credit to
put towards college. Overall, you’ve made a really good choice in choosing to take
this class. It is one of my favorites that I’ve ever taken. Keep a positive outlook this
year, don’t be afraid to ask for help, and stay focused. You’ll be fine.
Good Luck,
Abby Ponticello
Monday, June 9, 2014
Sunday, June 1, 2014
Tow #29: Waiting for Superman part 2
Waiting
For Superman, a documentary by director Davis Guggenheim and producer
Lesley Chilcott, exposes the major flaws of the United States public education
system and expresses a need for reform. It follows a number of ambitious young
children, both less- fortunate and well off, as they journey through the public
school system and eventually apply for acceptance at charter schools. One of
the major claims that is set forth by Waiting
For Superman is that the difficulty of firing a teacher from a position in
the public school system is extremely damaging for the good of the children at
stake. Based on the information provided in the film and outside testimony, I
am inclined to strongly agree with this claim.
The information provided in this
film informs the viewer that in many districts and states of America, there is
a stipulation in the contract of public school teachers that makes it very
difficult to fire them after they have been employed at any given district for
a certain amount of time. The statistic that was used to back this statement
was that in Illinois, while 1 in 97 attorneys loose their law licenses each
year, only 1 in 2500 teachers loose their teaching credentials. The difficulty
of firing teachers creates a situation known as the “lemon dance”, where each
year school districts shift around teachers that are openly known to be
incompetent or flat out bad. This creates a situation where districts keep
teachers that they know are not benefitting the students simply on a legal
formality. The students that fall into the hands of such teachers fall several
grade levels behind their counterparts with teachers that are effectively
covering all of the curriculum material. When these students are then moved on
to the next grade and integrated with their peers, they find themselves
struggling and becoming discouraged with the education system. For a system
that will enable students to succeed, the contractual obstacles that stand in
the way of firing truly bad teachers must be changed.
Tow #28: Waiting For Superman
Waiting
For Superman is a documentary from well-known American director Davis
Guggenheim and producer Lesley Chilcott. This film examines the flaws and
failures of the American public school system in relation to that of other
developed countries and the evolving expectations of education over time.
Several children of different socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds are followed
throughout the film and their difficulties in the public education system are
documented. Social activist and educator Geoffrey Canada, as well as other
education-authorities, offer commentary throughout the film. The exposé-type
nature of the content offered by Waiting
For Superman responds to obvious failings of schools, teachers, and
students in America over the last few decades, and a subsequent growing call
for reform.
Though this documentary embodies a
sentiment of the masses, the direct voice behind the information of the film is
director Davis Guggenheim. With this piece of work, Guggenheim aims to inform
his audience of average American viewers of the bad state of public schools
throughout the nation. By spreading awareness, the ultimate purpose is to rally
the American people to get involved and eventually change the failing system.
Though parents of children enrolled in “drop-out factory” inner city schools
may be well aware of the deplorable state of American education today, middle
or upper class Americans living in the suburbs may not have such a keen
awareness. Guggenheim uses this documentary as a means to spread information
beyond the direct pool of people it affects most.
This film is not only heavily
saturated with necessary information; it is also entertaining and contains many
elements of good cinematography. The soundtrack is one prime example of a
cinematic factor that helps to achieve the film’s purpose. The sad, slow piano
pieces that play during clips of less-fortunate children and schools create an
instant emotional appeal to the viewer that makes them feel personally invested
in the issues that are being depicted. The information being presented is
proved credible thanks to the wise selection of education-authorities such as
Geoffrey Canada and former DC school superintendent Michelle Rhee that comment
of the film’s content. The abundance of data and statistics relating to the
failures of public schools is also instrumental in exemplifying the terrible
state of the American public education system today. The inclusion of data
appeals to the reader’s sense of reason and rational thinking, as well as
proving that the views included are not biased and can be backed by cold hard
facts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)